Erfan Media

Candidate Records / Mike Rogers / Small businesses and competition En español

Mike Rogers on Small Businesses and Competition: The Tax Law's Small-Business Stock Break, His Support for Tariffs, and the Reciprocal Trade Act

Mike Rogers, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senate in Michigan, wrote in April 2026 that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act "boosts small businesses," but the law's expanded small-business stock exclusion sends 94 percent of its benefit to households with incomes over $1 million, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found.

Rogers called Trump's tariffs "masterful" and "necessary"; they have cost Michigan an estimated $23 billion since January 2025, mostly on parts and materials that Michigan manufacturers buy. He backs the Reciprocal Trade Act, and his campaign declined to comment when tariffs on Canada, Michigan's top export market, rose in August 2026.

Mike Rogers's Endorsements on Taxes, Tariffs and Small Businesses

What the Tariffs Mike Rogers Supports Cost Michigan Businesses

Frequently Asked Questions About Mike Rogers on Small businesses and competition

What is Mike Rogers's record on small businesses and competition under Trump?

Mike Rogers praised the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a law that boosts small businesses, though its expanded small-business stock exclusion sends most of its benefit to households earning over $1 million. He called Trump's tariffs "masterful" and "necessary" and backs a bill to let the president impose tariffs on his own. His campaign did not comment when new tariffs on Canada took effect in August 2026.

Who pays the tariffs Mike Rogers supports?

Mike Rogers supports tariffs paid by importers, and in Michigan about 64% of the cost fell on raw materials, parts and equipment that the state's manufacturers buy, by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation's estimate. The hardest-hit category in Michigan is cars and trucks, at $10 billion.

Does Mike Rogers support the Reciprocal Trade Act?

Yes. Mike Rogers told the Washington Examiner that letting the president impose matching tariffs is "wholly appropriate," USA Today reported in September 2026; the Supreme Court had ruled in February 2026 that the emergency law used for the broadest tariffs did not give the president that power.

Last updated: 2026-10-25

Candidate Records