Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.K. Lundblad's avatar

Micah Erfan, spot on. The US may have been fortunate to become as prosperous and powerful as it is, because most countries that utilize FPTP, single-member districts, and Presidential systems of government are not so lucky.

For the US, there are no easy fixes, but unicameralism, proportional representation, and parliamentarian appear to be, on balance, the better way to go: https://www.lianeon.org/p/imagining-our-martian-government

Michael A Alexander's avatar

I doubt any of those things will do the trick. It reflects what I would call the centrist fallacy. That the problems we face could be solved with a better government or better institutions, but that what we have underneath these institutions is sound.

Consider problems 1, 3, 6, 8 and 9 on your list. The better institutions approach would be to enact effective solutions to each of these five problems. Another approach would be to tweak a handful of core economic operation parameters to improve the functioning of the political economy that underlies the institutions and see how much of these problems go away. History suggests quite a bit. And then fine tune policy to improve things a bit more. You need the better institutions for this latter bit and also to address problems 2, 4, 5 and 7. Other than healthcare, these problems seem more tractable and probably would not require as much institutional improvement.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?